Most of us have barely enough time to spend analyzing our
cognitive apparatus [our Brain, or ‘thinking machine’]. This is because [for most of us], the ability
to hold firm [or cling], to this reality - takes all of our powers - of
tenacity, of will, of motivation, of pattern recognition and survival skills,
to purely ‘exist’. Many of us understand that this reality is far from benign,
for it carries huge risks and is peppered with dangerous crevices, where danger
lurks. There is additional danger, of hazards due to the huge influence of ‘randomness’
that is thrown into the proceedings. For all of us, the dangers are physical,
as well as mental, and many of these obstacles [or situations] can be fatal, so
we find that we use our cognitive apparatus, to just stay in the game – stay
alive, and helping others [that share this plane of existence] to do so, also. Survival
in this plane of existence can be viewed as our ability to traverse [akin to a
speck of dust in a Brownian
Motion tube] as safely as we can, in the random probability
cloud that envelopes us, in ‘the present’, and what can we term as ‘the moment’ or the
perceived, and then, interpreted situation - our reality.
Some of us are better
than others in managing our situation, of surviving reality, and the best we
can hope for is that our abilities in using our cognition, hedges our bets.
This is because when enveloped in the cloud of probability [that is ‘the
present’], the best we can hope for is to be like that horse-racing scout, up
early on the training grounds, watching the horses, the weather, the conditions
for the race, and making decisions all based on the observations that the
racing scout has perceived and then interpreted, in order to predict what the
future is likely to be. Therefore, whilst existing in ‘the present’, the
greater our ability to interpret the past, and understand how the cognitive
process of interpretation in our minds operate [ie our internal operating system] – the
better will be our chances in surviving the buffeting current of the
probability cloud, and surviving to our future. Though we can at best only hope to
hedge our bets, because the limitations of our mind, and our abilities in
cognition are further hampered by the randomness that pervades our existence.
And as the Bard once said in Hamlet……..ay, there’s the rub…..
“To be, or not to be: that is the question:
Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
And by opposing end them? To die: to sleep;
No more; and by a sleep to say we end
The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks
That flesh is heir to, 'tis a consummation
Devoutly to be wish'd. To die, to sleep;
To sleep: perchance to dream: ay, there's the rub;”
Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
And by opposing end them? To die: to sleep;
No more; and by a sleep to say we end
The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks
That flesh is heir to, 'tis a consummation
Devoutly to be wish'd. To die, to sleep;
To sleep: perchance to dream: ay, there's the rub;”
These thoughts make me visualise ourselves, to be that of figures, trapped within the confines of a giant conical tube, like an aviation wind
tunnel, bracing ourselves, when the engine of reality, [the turbine] is switched on,
and the wind tears at us, at our clothes, at our grip and our footing. Ahead of us, I understand that the turbulence [we find ourselves confronting, the 'situation', ‘the
present’] originates from deep within the probability cloud I.
The turbulence is caused by the forces at play within the probability cloud,
including our fellow beings with consciousness [as well from the interacting
inanimate objects, devoid of consciousness but replete with actions that can
come into contact with our hand and foot-holds in the wind tunnel. As we look
behind our shoulders, we can see what I term ‘the past’, the results of the random, as
well as the ‘erected’ events and decisions that have shaped themselves into the
construct we refer to as ‘days gone by.’ - our past.
A key element of survival in this existence, is our
ability to interpret the sensory input from the reality that surrounds,
filtering this information through our moods, channels of thought, past
reflections of what was the outcome of the ‘cause-to-effect’ ratios [ie pattern
recognition] et. al. to create the holographic image of our place in this
reality ie to use our brains to really delve beneath the surface veneer of the wind tunnel, confronting the turbulence that tugs on us
like a solar wind, as invisible, as it is lethal. Therefore one key survival
skill is our ability to question what this ‘place’ is, and how it works, or
more precisely our interpretation of our ‘situation’, or what we term ‘the
present’.
So, for some of us, the more we age, and for the more
adventurous [amongst us], and the more analytical we are, then, this allows those
of us [with this ‘curious / need to know’ inclination] to ruminate on what this
existence is all about. Many of us are looking for clues that might unlock what
existence is, and the more we ruminate by examining our thoughts [as to what
might be the answers], the more we realise it is likely to be plural, as
opposed to singular – ie there are many possibilities as to what this existence
is, or how it came into being, especially how crucial the observers are in order
to bring this existence into reality.
We should also start to consider that
existence, as a shape, is perhaps fractal in design and execution, as well as,
being in the shape of many possible existences, all available, all of the time, dimensional as well as functional, and all ‘in-concert’ as an endless array of choices around us. Some of us, from time to time, slip between scenarios, or traverse through
the ‘probability cloud’, or as some would term ‘the multiverse’. Others can't, they remain rooted in their belief systems as they get perturbed when a thought or observation conflicts with their value system. This is termed 'Cognitive Dissonance', the inability to manage thoughts and observations that conflict with their ingrained beliefs. This usually affects the deeply religious, the bigoted, the indoctrinated and those who live in denial.
One way to visualise what reality ‘is’ [or realities
‘are’], and the more robustly we have the ability to do so, then may well hedge our bets in
terms of surviving this probability cloud, and making it toward the future
[with the least amount of scars], like the racing tipster, in his grey raincoat
clutching his note book and binoculars on a misty morning, surveying the stallions,
and the trainers milling around and preparing to enter the probability cloud;
and betting on the outcome.
Others use another technique, flipping that coin that
lies in their pocket, or pinning the existential tail, on the existential
donkey.
Some do nothing, but leave their destiny to the hand of fate.
I know which method I prefer.
Age is helpful, but more crucial is the ability to
learn from the events and experiences that pepper our past observations, trying
to understand causality [‘cause-to-result’] in our lives and the existential
parameters that define the rules and events of the game. Age has also made me
focus on what is so key to traversing from the present to the future, and
surviving, or at best hedging my bets to survive the game. An understanding of
the rules is also key to surviving the game, but when we entered the game of
life, we were not issued with a rule book. Instead we had to use our skills
[within our cognitive sensory apparatus] to interpret the reality we find
ourselves in, and piece together the rules that govern the swirls and currents
within the probability cloud - to survive to the future, and then the cycle
repeats, because if the present is a probability cloud, we have to become good
at the decision making process, because when the road ahead forks, as it does
many times in our lives [with some forks less important than others], each
time we approach a fork, we must understand how crucial it is to make the right
decision.
It is useful to look back at the past, turning our heads
to examine the decisions we made, and how we came to make those decisions – and
what where the results from those decisions, and how they shaped the ‘present
situation’ we find ourselves in.
One important consideration is to actually make a
decision; and understanding that the internal
filters that power our cognition, will influence the decision we arrive at, and
one that we travel along.
We must also understand that the first part is
straight forward, ie actually making the decision. Some suffer
‘decision-paralysis’, like that rabbit forever trapped by the magnetic
attraction of those headlights coming at us, and so pause worried which
direction, which decision we should take as the lights come at us. When we
hear the squeal of brakes, and the abrasive tears of the rubber tyres hitting
our body, we realise we’re too late. Our hesitation was [when placed
‘in-concert’ with the upcoming lights from the future, colliding with our
present] our demise, and the words ‘game over’ come to mind.
So if we can overcome the dithering [and our default position,
which is procrastination] when weighing up what decision to make when the road
forks, we have a secondary problem to consider. The cognitive process that our
consciousness [as well as our subconscious] mind deploys in filtering through
our sensory apparatus and signals can pose dangerous traits that must be
managed. The inputs that shape what decision we have to come to, have to
traverse our mood, our health, the context of our existence [like what
handholds we have in the wind-tunnel], our past memories of the effects of
causality, our prejudices and preferences – in making the decision. The danger
is that unlike the rocks around us, our minds are conscious and therefore have
subjective methods of analysis, therefore if we bias our decision upon our
mood, then our thinking is swayed away from the objective, so we may well make a
decision that is not logical, as our thoughts and cognitive channels that our
thoughts traverse, may be disingenuous. Feelings and Mood are dangerous shapes
to hook our anchors and decision making process to, because they are not
constants, they shift and change and those shifts alter / influence our outlook upon
life, and the probability cloud we find ourselves in. This can lead us to make
bad decisions, which lead us into difficult situations.
I recall a funny line
from Woody Allen’s 1973 film Sleeper when asked about his mind, he retorts “…my
brain: it's my second favourite organ….” So if we then consider that
Allen’s character’s male sexual organs are his favourite organ, then any
decision making process, based on his immediate sexual needs, is in turn influenced by
the level or concentration of Testosterone in the blood stream [and the production
and equilibrium level of that male sex hormone is in turn influenced by our
self-worth, our state of mind etc] – so we must take care when confronted with a
fork in the road that has a sexual element involved in the decision we must
make. This rationale illustrates why so many marriages,
partnerships, or relationships will fail, as one or both partners may make very
crucial decisions, that will affect the rest of their lives, but are/were heavily influenced
by their ‘mood’ [at that moment], which in turn is chemically, as well as
cognitively related to their thinking process.
So the
way we think is vital to manage [and in turn, survive] the reality, or
probability cloud that is ‘the situation’ or ‘the present’ – we find ourselves
in, and therefore will steer the path to our future or futures, depending on
the conceptualisation we create of what the future holds for us.
One key
aspect of managing our cognition or thought process is what is termed Neuro-linguistic programming [NLP] or Cognitive Behavioral Therapy [CBT];
which in its simplest definition is the language we deploy to communicate,
which in turn at best influences, or at worst controls our thinking. We must
take care in the language and the way we deploy our language to those around
us, not just verbal, but also non-verbal communication, because not only does
it send signals and alters the thinking of those that co-exist with us in the
wind-tunnel, or probability cloud that is ‘the present’, but worryingly, it
also shapes what the way we think, and that in turn shapes what we perceive as
our reality, and that finally makes us come to the decisions in our lives, when
the road forks.
So Descartes was right, when he
postulated “I think, therefore, I am.”
Be careful when making your decisions,
and always be aware that you are not alone in the “probability cloud”, that is
“the present”. You actions and decisions may well have a ripple effect on the
others around you, just as their decisions and actions will affect you, as you
traverse toward the future.
Sometimes the decisions we make, and the
actions we take [or not take] may influence [at best], and define [at worst]
who we are; and in the journey that is the movement from the present, into the
future, we should understand that the forks in the road, and the decisions
we’ve made will change us, make us different to the reflections of ourselves,
as we look behind ourselves at the past, and what happened. We must also
realise that the cognitive process within our brains also has the ability to
alter our recollections of past events and deeds, often as a coping mechanism,
but also as a method of rationalising our existence; our place in the probability
cloud that is the present.
I think David Byrne and Talking Heads
summed it up well
While
Michael Stipe and his colleagues at REM took another view of these themes of
confronting the present as we move forward to the future
While
Stipe was influenced by the tempo and significance of David Essex, and this
song which also resonates with the themes of this essay
So when
someone tells you [usually with a disingenuous voice or agenda], ‘hey you’ve changed’. You should smile and remind yourself that, of
course you have changed; as the act of decision making and living with the
consequences of those decisions, will
change you, to lesser or greater degrees, because one of the reasons why Paul
Valery remarked ‘the future is not what
it used to be’, is because you made a decision today [in the present], as
have others, and the fruits of those decisions, is what we term as the future, a future where you are different.
If you prevaricated,
or procrastinated when faced with the fork in the road, rather than grapple
with the situation in the probability cloud, and face up to the consequences of
your decision, you could be that rabbit hypnotized as the lights come at you, and take you out of the game, leaving just a rubber skid mark as a reminder, that you did indeed exist.
You should perhaps also ponder on the fact that the concept of time [that we've been lead to believe] may well be erroneous, as time does not flow in the 'river' analogy, but could be better considered as a construct we've created, to rationalize the events that occur, and linked to the decision making process, interacting with those of others as well as the random interactions of events to the observers trapped in the probability cloud.
More troubling is the question of the veracity of what we term 'free will', because if the axioms discussed here have validity [to greater and lesser degrees], then the whole concept of 'free will' comes into question, for it is far from an absolute concept.
'Free Will' like 'Time' may well be a construct of sorts.
Why, Why, Why?
The ability to create abstract concepts such as 'time', or 'free will' may well be yet another coping mechanism, a method to cognitively create order where there is none, and also to fool ourselves into believing that we have purpose in this reality, when perhaps there is none, for the probability cloud we term 'the present', physically is a trap we find ourselves in; a trap constructed on a giant rock, caught up in a tiny part of 'space-time', for which the only escape or solace [as conscious beings] is the knowledge [no matter how disingenuous] that there is meaning [to our lives] within the swirls of the probability cloud, and that we have significance, when most of what we perceive, and cognitively distill - indicates that there is none.
Another coping mechanism, is the understanding that if all this is 'true' then our existence in this 'probability cloud', that we term 'the present' is, above all else absurd, and we must console ourselves with laughter at the situation we find ourselves in.
Because if we didn't then it is 'game over man, game fucking over'
No comments:
Post a Comment